Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: There are few studies of the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx). This is the first study to compare long-term clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in IABP-treated HTx patients and electively transplanted patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective study of all adult HTx recipients between 2001 and 2007. Thirty-two patients (aged 50 +/- 13 years) treated with IABP, as a bridge to HTx due to severe hypo-perfusion, were compared with 135 electively transplanted patients (aged 54 +/- 11 years). The mean time from onset of IABP to HTx was 21 +/- 16 days. Clinical condition improved during IABP treatment. Serum creatinine decreased from 128 +/- 56 to 102 +/- 29 micromol/L (P < 0.01), aspartate transaminase from 682 +/- 1299 to 63 +/- 89 U/L (P = 0.01), and ALAT from 483 +/- 867 to 126 +/- 284 U/L (P = 0.02). Intra-aortic balloon pump treatment related complications were few. Mortality was similar in the IABP and control groups at 30 days post-HTx (6.2 vs.3.7%, P = 0.54), at 1 year (9.4 vs.11.1%, P = 0.80), and beyond. Long-term clinical and haemodynamic indices were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intra-aortic balloon pump treatment stabilizes patients in end-stage heart failure, is safe, well tolerated, and is successful in bridging acutely decompensated patients to transplantation. Complications are few and manageable. Following IABP and HTx, short- and long-term survival, biochemical and invasive and non-invasive haemodynamic outcomes were similar to those in electively transplanted patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gjesdal et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: