Key result
The Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.839) and a significant positive correlation with the GAF score (r=0.927, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Is the Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP-CHN) reliable and valid for assessing personal and social functioning in patients with severe mental disorders?
Observational (n=285)
Is the Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP-CHN) reliable and valid for assessing personal and social functioning in patients with severe mental disorders?
Effect estimate: r 0.927
p-value: p=<.01
The Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing personal and social functioning in patients with severe mental disorders.
Supports PSP-CHN reliability in Chinese severe mental illness; extends validation evidence but leaves open prospective confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to determine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP-CHN) and assess the applicability of using the PSP-CHN in patients with severe mental disorders. METHODS: A total of 285 outpatients with severe mental disorders, 220 with schizophrenia and 65 with major depressive disorder, were enrolled into the study. Both diagnoses were made using the DSM-IV. All the patients were assessed with the PSP-CHN, the GAF, and the CGI-S. In addition, the PANSS and the MADRS were used to assess the patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, respectively. RESULTS: The PSP-CHN showed good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.839, n = 285), high interrater reliability for total scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.865, n = 48), and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.892, n = 130). The PSP-CHN total score showed a statistically significant positive correlation with the GAF score (r = 0.927, P < .01, n = 285), as well as a significant negative correlation with the CGI-S total score (r = -0.793, P < .01, n = 285), the PANSS total score (r = -0.694, P < .01, n = 220), and the MADRS total score (r = -0.721, P < .01, n = 65). DISCUSSION: We were able to demonstrate that the PSP-CHN is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the personal and social functioning in patients with severe mental disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiao et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Severe mental disorders (schizophrenia and major depressive disorder) (n=285). Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP-CHN) was evaluated on Reliability and validity of the PSP-CHN (internal consistency, interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and correlation with other scales) (r 0.927, p=<.01). The Chinese version of the Personal and Social Performance scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.839) and a significant positive correlation with the GAF score (r=0.927, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: