Key result
SGLT2i use is not associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmias compared to DPP4i in T2D.
Why the study?
The association between sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors use and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias among patients with type 2 diabetes was uncertain.
Does SGLT2i use reduce the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to DPP4i use?
Cohort (n=88,516)
Does SGLT2i use reduce the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to DPP4i use?
Hazard Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.71–1.07)
In a large UK cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT2i use was not associated with a reduced overall risk of ventricular arrhythmias compared to DPP4i use, though it was associated with a lower risk of cardiac arrest.
No VA risk reduction with SGLT2i versus DPP4i in T2D; should not change practice and leaves open need for RCTs.
AIMS: To determine whether sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) use, compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) use, is associated with the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) among patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using a prevalent new-user design and data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, linked to hospitalisation and vital statistics data. SGLT2i users were matched to DPP4i users on diabetes treatment intensity, duration of prior DPP4i use, calendar time, sex, age, and time-conditional propensity score. Cox models estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for VA with SGLT2i vs. DPP4i use. Secondary analyses stratified by SGLT2i user type. Secondary outcomes included fatal VA and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: Among 88 516 matched patients, 385 VA events occurred over a mean follow-up of 0.86 years (25.3 per 10 000 person-years). Overall, SGLT2i use was not associated with the risk of VA (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71-1.07). There was no association among incident new users (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.76-1.27) but SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk among prevalent new users (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92). SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of cardiac arrest (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49-0.83); our analysis of fatal VA was inconclusive due to sparse data (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 0.47-6.64). CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i use was not associated with the risk of VA among patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=88,516). Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.07). SGLT2i use was not associated with the risk of ventricular arrhythmias compared with DPP4i use among patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: