Key result
Acute stress using the Maastricht Acute Stress Test reduced error-related negativity amplitude in high cortisol responders and increased error positivity amplitudes compared to control.
Why the study?
Does acute stress modulate error processing in healthy males?
RCT (n=39)
Randomly exposed
Does acute stress modulate error processing in healthy males?
Acute stress impairs error detection, particularly in individuals with high cortisol responses, but leads to greater error assessment once the error is consciously realized.
Acute stress may compromise early error detection in high-cortisol responders; extends evidence on stage-specific effects of stress on performance monitoring.
Error processing is critical for adaptive behaviors. Acute stress has been found to influence error processing. However, the neural dynamic correlates underlying this modulation remain elusive. To address this issue, we recruited 39 healthy male participants, who performed a two-session task before and after an acute stress test while their behavioral and EEG data were recorded. The participants were randomly exposed to either a stress condition (Maastricht Acute Stress Test) or a control condition. The stress test consisted of several hand immersion tasks (ice-cold water, 2°C) and mental arithmetic tasks. A color-word Stroop task was used to investigate the stress effect on error responses. Based on the level of stress-induced cortisol, the participants in the stress group were further classified as low (N = 13) or high (N = 13) cortisol responders. The results indicated that only in the high cortisol responders, the error-related negativity (ERN) amplitude was reduced after acute stress. In addition, the ∆ERN in the high cortisol responders was significantly smaller than that in the low cortisol responders. These results suggest that acute stress impairs error detection. However, the error positivity amplitudes increased in the stress group compared to the control group, indicating that acute stress leads to greater error assessment. Taken together, these results suggest that acute stress impairs error detection, which is modulated by individuals' response level following acute stress, and leads to more emotional and/or motivational responses to the error signal once the error is consciously realized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=39). Maastricht Acute Stress Test vs. Control condition was evaluated on Error-related negativity (ERN) and error positivity amplitudes. Acute stress using the Maastricht Acute Stress Test reduced error-related negativity amplitude in high cortisol responders and increased error positivity amplitudes compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: