NaX zeolite was ion-exchanged to obtain LiX and AgX zeolites. The LiX form was further exchanged to replace 20% of the Li + cations by Ag +, to obtain a LiAgX zeolite. Equilibrium adsorption isotherms of pure-component N 2 and O 2 were measured at 25 and 50 °C on these four zeolites. AgX was stable since the N 2 isotherm was not affected after prolonged exposure of the zeolite to air at 350 °C. Bonding of N 2 was substantially stronger on AgX than on the other zeolites. The high isosteric heat of adsorption (8.4 kcal/mol) and the relatively slow desorption of N 2 on AgX indicated some degree of weak π-complexation, which was substantiated by molecular orbital calculation results using model systems. Binary N 2 /O 2 selectivity (or separation factor, α) was calculated by using the ideal adsorbed solution theory. The high N 2 /O 2 selectivities at low total pressures for AgX will result in difficult N 2 desorption; therefore, AgX is not suitable for air separation. LiX is presently employed in industry as the sorbent for air separation by pressure-swing adsorption. Comparing LiX with LiAgX, the N 2 /O 2 selectivities were higher for LiAgX at high total pressures and lower for LiAgX at lower pressures, due to a (relative) selectivity reversal. This result, combined with the higher N 2 capacity for LiAgX, led to the conclusion that LiAgX can be superior to LiX for air separation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: