We histologically evaluated protocol biopsy specimens of renal allografts obtained in the early period and 1 year after transplantation. The patients were divided into those with at least one history of acute rejection (AR group) and no history of rejection (NAR group), and the histopathological features in the two groups were compared. A total of 45 early protocol biopsy specimens were obtained from 40 patients, and 31 1-year biopsy specimens were obtained from 30 patients. Acute rejection (AR) or borderline change was observed in the early protocol biopsy specimens from 19 (45.2%) cases. AR or borderline change was observed in 12 of 19 (63.2%) in the AR group, and in 7/26 cases (26.9%) in the NAR group. The incidence of AR or borderline change in the AR group was higher than in the NAR group. Toxic tubulopathy was found in the early protocol biopsy in 16 cases (35.6%). The 1-year biopsies tended to reveal more complicated findings. Chronic rejection (CR) was seen in 8/16 cases (50.0%) in the AR group, and it was more frequent than NAR group (two cases, 13.3%). In conclusion, the incidences of both AR and CR were higher in the cases with a previous episode of AR. The early protocol biopsy was useful in screening for subclinical AR and toxic tubulopathy. The 1-year biopsy was useful for evaluating various types of chronic graft damage. We expect that adequate treatment based on protocol biopsy findings in each patient will lead to better graft survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanetsuna et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: