Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This study compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using a second generation contrast medium versus CT or MRA in the assessment of vascular and biliary complications in postoperative follow-up of liver transplantation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study group consisted of 36 consecutive liver transplant recipients who underwent post-transplantation CEUS examination after developing ascites and/or unclear liver function tests. Real time CEUS was performed after a bolus injection of SonoVue (1.6-2.4 ml, Bracco, Imaging Germany) followed by 10 ml of saline solution. Using contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) technique (Logiq 9, GE) with a 2.5-4-MHz transducer, a low mechanical index was chosen to avoid early destruction of the microbubbles (MI 0.1-0.2). In order to confirm the results, the patients underwent contrast-enhanced MRI or CT. RESULTS: Complications were identified in 16 of 36 patients (44.4%). Five transplants (14%) had hepatic artery thrombosis (n=2) or significant stenosis (n=3). Six transplants (16%) developed portal vein stenosis (n=4) or portal vein thrombosis (n=2). MRI or CT confirmed the findings of the CEUS in all 11 cases. Biliary stricture at the anastomotic site was detected in 5 patients. MR-CP confirmed the findings of all strictures. CONCLUSION: Due to advances in contrast-enhanced US, vascular and biliary complications in the postoperative period following liver transplantation can be reliably diagnosed non-invasively on the intensive care unit. CEUS shows vascular as well as biliary complications in the postoperative patient with a high degree of accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clevert et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: