Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Misunderstanding apparent activation energy ( E aa ) can cause serious error in lifetime predictions. In this paper, the E aa is investigated for sub 20 nm NAND flash memory. In a high-temperature (HT) regime, the interface trap ( N it ) recovery mechanism has the greatest impact on the charge loss. However, the values of E aa and E a (Nit) have a wide difference. Also, the lifetime of the device cannot be estimated by the Arrhenius model due to the E aa roll-off behavior. For the first time, we reveal the origin of abnormal characteristics on E aa and derive a mathematical formula for E aa as a function of each E a (mechanism) in NAND flash memory. Using the proposed E aa equation, the accurate lifetime for the device is estimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: