Key result
Sitagliptin post-MI shows no increased risk of major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of sitagliptin in type 2 diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction remained uncertain.
Does sitagliptin increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients with recent acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=3,282)
Does sitagliptin increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients with recent acute myocardial infarction?
In a population-based cohort of type 2 diabetic patients with recent acute myocardial infarction, the use of sitagliptin was not associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sitagliptin safety post-MI in T2DM; leaves open need for RCT confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, in type 2 diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has so far remained uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), a government-operated, population-based database, from March 1st, 2009 to December 31st, 2011. Type 2 diabetic patients hospitalized for AMI were included in our study. We compared subjects using sitagliptin with comparison group to evaluate its cardiovascular safety and efficacy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. RESULTS: We identified a total of 3,282 type 2 diabetic patients hospitalized for AMI (mean follow-up 1.15 years). Of these patients, 547 (16.7%) who were exposed to sitagliptin were defined as the sitagliptin group and 2,735 (83.3 %) who did not use sitagliptin were the comparison group. The incidence of primary composite cardiovascular outcomes was 9.50 per 100 person-years in the sitagliptin group and was 9.70 per 100 person-years in the comparison group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29, P=0.849). Compared to the non-sitagliptin group, the sitagliptin group had similar risks of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure (HF) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a HR of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.61-1.11, P=0.195), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.67-1.29, P=0.660), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.75-1.14, P=0.473), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of sitagliptin in type 2 diabetic patients with recent AMI was not associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with acute myocardial infarction (n=3,282). Sitagliptin vs. Non-sitagliptin users was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.29, p=0.849).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: