Key result
Melatonin treatment significantly ameliorated doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity and oxidative stress in male rats.
Melatonin may attenuate doxorubicin testicular toxicity in rats; hypothesis-generating for fertility preservation, with human trials needed.
This study investigated the protective effects of melatonin (MLT) against doxorubicin (DXR)-induced testicular toxicity and oxidative stress in rats. DXR was given as a single intraperitoneal dose of 10 mg kg(-1) body weight to male rats at 1 h after MLT treatment on day 6 of the study. MLT at 15 mg kg(-1) body weight was administered daily by gavage for 5 days before DXR treatment followed by an additional dose for 5 days. Sperm analysis, histopathological examination and biochemical methods were used for this investigation. DXR caused a decrease in the weight of seminal vesicles, epididymal sperm count and motility and an increase in the incidence of histopathological changes of the testis. In addition, an increased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration and decreased glutathione content, glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities were observed. On the contrary, MLT treatment significantly ameliorated DXR-induced testicular toxicity in rats. Moreover, MDA concentration and GR, GST and SOD activities were not affected when MLT was administered in conjunction with DXR. These results indicate that MLT had a protective effect against DXR-induced testicular toxicity and that the protective effects of MLT may be due to both the inhibition of lipid peroxidation and increased antioxidant activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2011) studied Doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity. Melatonin vs. Doxorubicin alone was evaluated on Testicular toxicity and oxidative stress (sperm analysis, histopathology, biochemical markers). Melatonin treatment significantly ameliorated doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity and oxidative stress in male rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: