Why the study?
Selecting candidates who will benefit from pulmonary endarterectomy in CTEPH remains challenging due to subjective decision-making and the need to characterize large and small vessel disease contributions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The optimal characterization of large and small vessel disease contribution to pulmonary vascular resistance is crucial for indicating and predicting outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy in CTEPH.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) comprises organizing thrombotic obstructions in the pulmonary arteries by nonresolving thromboemboli, formation of fibrosis and remodeling of pulmonary blood vessels. Surgical pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the therapy of choice for patients with surgically accessible CTEPH, which leads to a profound improvement in hemodynamics, functional class and survival. Selecting the candidates that will benefit from surgery is still a challenging task. Criteria for surgical suitability have been described but the decision-making for or against surgical intervention remains still subjective. The optimal characterization of the reciprocal contribution of large vessel and small vessel disease in the elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance is crucial for the indication and outcome of PEA. Recently, Toshner et al intended to validate the partition resistance into small and large vessels compartments (upstream resistance: Rup) by the occlusion technique in the preoperative assessment of PEA. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Rup and compare it with other hemodynamic predictor to evaluate operative risk in CTEPH patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juan C. Grignola (2013) conducted a review in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Upstream resistance (Rup) assessment vs. Other hemodynamic predictors was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: