Key result
BASED score of 5 linked to 100% scalp HFO detection compared to low scores.
Why the study?
Tools for measuring the likelihood of relapse in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome treatment could aid clinicians in management decisions, but the association between scalp high-frequency oscillations and BASED scores was unclear.
Is there an association between BASED scores and scalp high-frequency oscillations in patients with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Is there an association between BASED scores and scalp high-frequency oscillations in patients with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 7.7%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Scalp high-frequency oscillations correlate strongly with higher BASED scores in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome, suggesting their potential as an objective biomarker for disease severity.
May support scalp HFOs as adjunct to BASED scoring; hypothesis-generating for outcome prediction in spasms syndrome.
Tools for measuring the likelihood of relapse in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) treatment could aid clinicians in making critical management decisions. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs), transient bursts of electroencephalography (EEG) activity with frequencies beyond 80 Hz, are a new and promising noninvasive biomarker. The present study aimed to investigate the association between the Burden of Amplitudes and Epileptiform Discharges (BASED) scores, an interictal EEG grading scale for IESS, and scalp HFOs in patients with IESS. The study enrolled 50 patients, 25 with a clinical diagnosis of IESS and 25 without epilepsy. The percentage of patients with at least one scalp HFO detected, stratified by BASED scores, differed significantly: for BASED scores ≤ 2, 7.7%; for 3, 16.7%; for 4, 87.5%; and for 5, 100% (p < 0.001). Compared with BASED scores ≤ 2, the median scalp HFO detection rate was significantly highest for BASED scores of 5 (median [IQR]: 6.24 [2.25–8.32], p < 0.001), followed by BASED scores of 4. The scalp HFO detection rates showed a better performance in estimating patients with BASED scores of 4 and 5. It is hoped that scalp HFOs can be used as an objective indicator to validate the results of BASED scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeda et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) (n=50). Higher BASED scores vs. BASED scores ≤ 2 was evaluated on Detection of at least one scalp high-frequency oscillation (HFO) (p=< 0.001). Scalp high-frequency oscillation detection rates were significantly associated with higher BASED scores, occurring in 100% of patients with a score of 5 compared to 7.7% with scores ≤ 2 (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: