Key result
Novel DI-controlled pacing protocol reveals non-conformal alternans dynamics compared to standard restitution in simulated ventricles.
Why the study?
Existing methods cannot quantify how much electrical restitution contributes to alternans of repolarization in cardiac myocytes.
Does a novel pacing protocol controlling diastolic interval better quantify the contribution of electrical restitution to repolarization alternans compared to standard methods in a simulated canine ventricular model?
Does a novel pacing protocol controlling diastolic interval better quantify the contribution of electrical restitution to repolarization alternans compared to standard methods in a simulated canine ventricular model?
A novel pacing protocol in a simulated canine ventricular model allows for better quantification of the diastolic interval-dependent contribution to repolarization alternans, unmasking mechanisms missed by standard restitution methods.
Challenges standard restitution protocols under altered ICaL; leaves open translation to clinical alternans assessment.
There is evidence that alternans of repolarization, i.e. a beat to beat alternation in the action potential duration (APD), is a precursor to ventricular fibrillation. Electrical restitution is considered important in predicting the onset of alternans in cardiac myocytes. Restitution predicts action potential duration (APD) based on the preceding diastolic interval (DI). Determining how much restitution contributes to alternans is not possible with existing methods. We used mathematical models and control of DI using a novel pacing protocol to quantify DI dependent contribution to alternans. Using the canine ventricular model (CVM), we paced at one end of the simulated tissue and found the DI dependent contribution as a rate of increase in the amplitude of alternans as a function of tissue length. Through manipulation of different ionic currents, we compared the new method with standard and dynamic restitution to quantify the contribution of different ionic currents towards DI independent and dependent components. When the L‐type calcium current was altered, we found non‐conformal changes between standard restitution and our method at a controlled DI value of 30 msec. These results suggest that the new method allows for unmasking of features of mechanisms of alternans not seen with current methods. Supported by grant CBET 0730450 from the National Science Foundation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Traxel et al. (2009) studied Alternans of repolarization. Novel pacing protocol to control diastolic interval (DI) vs. Standard and dynamic restitution was evaluated on DI dependent contribution to alternans. A novel pacing protocol in a simulated canine ventricular model revealed non-conformal changes compared to standard restitution when L-type calcium current was altered at a controlled DI of 30 msec.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: