Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An ideal diagnostic test for Alzheimer's disease (AD) should be non-invasive and easily applicable. Thus, there is a clear need to search for biomarkers in blood. In the present study, we have used multivariate data analysis [support vector machine (SVM)] to investigate whether a blood-based biomarker panel allows discrimination between AD patients and healthy controls at the individual level. We collected a total of 155 serum samples from individuals with early AD and age-matched healthy controls and measured serum levels of 24 markers involved in several biological pathways by ELISA. The dataset was randomly split into a training set for predictor discovery and classification training and a test set for class prediction of blinded samples (3:1 ratio) to evaluate the chosen predictors and parameters. After selection of a feature group of the three most discriminative parameters (cortisol, von Willebrand factor, oxidized LDL antibodies) in the training set, the application of SVM to the training/independent test dataset resulted in an 81.7%/87.1% correct classification for AD and control subjects. In conclusion, we identified a panel of three blood markers, which allowed SVM-based distinguishing of AD patients from healthy controls on a single-subject classification level with clinically relevant accuracy and validity. Blood-based biomarkers might have utility in AD diagnostics as screening tool before further classification with CSF biomarkers and imaging. Future studies should examine whether blood-based biomarkers may also be useful to differentiate AD patients from other dementias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laske et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: