Key result
Higher admission internal jugular vein distensibility is linked to ~69% lower six-month ADHF rehospitalization risk.
Why the study?
Residual systemic congestion after treatment for acute decompensated heart failure is common and difficult to assess non-invasively.
Does internal jugular vein distensibility (DIJV) assessment predict residual congestion and six-month ADHF rehospitalization in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure?
Observational (n=112)
No
Does internal jugular vein distensibility (DIJV) assessment predict residual congestion and six-month ADHF rehospitalization in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure?
Internal jugular vein distensibility is a simple, dynamic ultrasound marker that improves with decongestion, and its persistent impairment identifies ADHF patients at higher risk for residual congestion and 6-month rehospitalization.
DIJV may aid bedside assessment of residual congestion post-ADHF; leaves open whether it improves risk stratification or guides decongestion in prospective studies.
Background: Residual systemic congestion is common after treatment for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and remains difficult to assess non-invasively. We investigated internal jugular vein distensibility (DIJV) as a dynamic marker of residual congestion and its association with established congestion parameters and clinical outcomes. Methods: In this prospective single-center study, 112 patients hospitalized with ADHF underwent clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and venous ultrasound assessment at admission and after decongestive treatment. DIJV was calculated as the ratio of maximal internal jugular vein diameter during Valsalva to resting diameter, with DIJV ≥ 4 indicating preserved distensibility. Results: At the final in-hospital assessment, 59 patients (52.7%) had persistent DIJV < 4. These patients had higher NT-proBNP, larger inferior vena cava diameter, greater portal vein pulsatility, higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and lower TAPSE/PASP compared with patients with preserved DIJV. They also had longer hospital stays and higher rates of ADHF rehospitalization and six-month mortality. Higher admission DIJV remained associated with lower odds of six-month ADHF rehospitalization after multivariable adjustment (OR 0.31 per 1-unit increase, 95% CI 0.15–0.59; p < 0.001). Conclusions: DIJV improves with decongestive treatment, but frequently remains impaired. Persistent impairment is associated with a broader residual-congestion profile and adverse clinical outcomes, supporting DIJV as a simple, dynamic adjunct to multiparametric congestion assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grigore et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (n=112). Internal jugular vein distensibility (DIJV) vs. Lower DIJV was evaluated on Six-month ADHF rehospitalization (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.59, p=<0.001). Higher admission internal jugular vein distensibility was associated with a significantly lower risk of six-month rehospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (OR 0.31 per 1-unit increase).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: