The elastic dynamic Young’s moduli (YM) and relaxation (amplitude-independent internal friction) properties of V and low-activated vanadium alloys (V–W–Cr, V–W–Cr–Zr, V–Ta–Cr–Zr, V–4Cr–4Ti) are studied in the frequency-temperature ranges (0.5–30.0 Hz, 25–400°C) and (100 kHz, –170–20°C). The diffusion parameters (diffusion activation energies, relaxation times, diffusion coefficients) and solid-solution concentrations of interstitial atoms C, O, N are determined for these materials. No solid solution of C is detected in V and alloys. No solid-solution concentration of O and N is detected in the V4–Cr4–Ti alloy. Zr alloying (V–W–Cr–Zr, V–Ta–Cr–Zr) significantly reduces the solid-solution concentration of interstitial elements O and N. In the alloys, the YM values can be both lower and higher than the YM values in V depending on the alloy type (alloying system, concentrations of C, O, N) and temperature. The lowest YM values are observed in the V-4Ti-4Cr alloy for all temperatures. The highest YM is found in the V–W–Cr–Zr alloy. In the room temperature range, the YM values obtained by low-frequency dynamic mechanical spectroscopy and ultrasonic resonance vibrations (100 kHz) are in good agreement (differences ≤2%). Approximating expressions for linear YM dependencies (without relaxation) are obtained for the materials under study. The number of YM defects increases with growing solid-solution concentration of O and N. The levels of dynamic drag of dislocations (viscous drag coefficients) which determine the brittleness of the studied materials are estimated. The V–Ta–Cr–Zr alloy is the least brittle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moroz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: