Interaction of the closo -decaborate clusters [Bu n 4 N][B 10 H 9 (NCR)] (R = Me 1a, Et 1b, Bu t 1c, Ph 1d ) with the azide [Ph 3 PNPPh 3 ]N 3 proceeds immediately upon mixing the reagents in an MeCN solution at RT, giving the borylated 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles [B 10 H 9 (N 4 CR)] 2– in essentially quantitative yield. On a synthetic scale, sodium azide, NaN 3, reacts similarly with the nitrile functionality of 1a – d in an acetonitrile suspension under mild conditions (RT, 15 h) to afford selectively the borylated tetrazoles [Bu n 4 N] 2 [B 10 H 9 (N 4 CR)] ( 2a – d; 88–96% isolated yields) and the water-soluble Na 2 [B 10 H 9 (N 4 CR)] species ( 3a – d; ca. 95% isolated yield) after the metathetical reaction with NaBPh 4 in MeOH/H 2 O. The reaction with N 3 – represents the first example of the propargyl-allenyl anion type dipole cycloaddition (CA) to the nitrilium derivatives of any boron clusters. Reactions of 1a – d with alkyl or aryl azides ( p -Me-C 6 H 4 -COCH 2 N 3, p -NO 2 -C 6 H 4 -CH 2 N 3, PhN 3 ) do not proceed even under harsh conditions (2 d, dry EtCN, 100 °C, under Ar). However, corresponding 1,4,5-trisubstituted tetrazoles 4a – d, 5, and 6 and 1,3,5-isomers 4′a – d, 5′, and 6′ were obtained by alkylation of 2a – d . The isomers were separated by column chromatography and identified by 2D NOESY NMR and X-ray crystallography (for 5 and 6′ ). Compounds 2a – d, 3a – d, 4a, b, 4′a – d, 5, 6, 5′, and 6′ were characterized by ICP-MS-based B analysis, high-resolution ESI-MS, molar conductivity, IR, and 1 H, 13 C{ 1 H}, and 11 B{ 1 H} NMR spectroscopies. The structures of 2c, 5, and 6′ were elucidated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Theoretical calculations at the DFT level (B3LYP and M06-2X functionals) allowed the establishment of the reaction mechanism, which is stepwise in the case of the azide-ion CA and concerted asynchronous (by 30–43%) for the hypothetical CA of RN 3 . The higher reactivity of N 3 – toward the borylated nitriles in comparison with organic azides RN 3 (by 10.8–18.7 kcal/mol in terms of Δ G s ⧧ values calculated at M06-2X) is mostly accounted for by the solvent effects, and these reactions are controlled by kinetic rather than thermodynamic factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mindich et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: