Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Composite hydrogels based on N -acetylcysteine-modified chitosan (CHS-NAC), silk fibroin (SF), and hydroxyapatite (HAp) were developed via horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-mediated enzymatic crosslinking for subchondral bone regeneration. The novelty of the system lies in integrating NAC-modified chitosan, characterised by reactive –SH groups and antioxidant activity, with SF and HAp within a single enzymatically crosslinked matrix, while directly comparing synthesised (HAp-syn) and commercial (HAp-com) mineral phases. CHS-NAC contained 225.35 μmol g −1 –SH groups and exhibited antioxidant activity of 13.91 ± 0.71 μg Trolox equivalents per g −1 of materials. Although SF reduced antioxidant activity by ~25%, incorporating either HAp restored it to levels comparable to CHS-NAC. The hydrogels exhibited interconnected porosity, composition-dependent swelling, stability in simulated physiological media, and predominantly elastic behaviour (G′ > G″). HAp markedly increased rheological stiffness, with CHS-NAC_SF_5HAp-syn showing the highest G′ and the greatest critical strain among HAp-containing composites. HAp-syn also enabled more controlled modulation of surface roughness than HAp-com. Biological evaluation confirmed the absence of sustained cytotoxic effects and progressive MC3T3-E1 proliferation over 7 days. Osteogenic performance was assessed by ALP activity at 7, 14, and 21 days, Alizarin Red S mineralisation, and quantification of OCN and RUNX2. CHS-NAC_SF_5HAp-syn showed the highest mineralisation, while selected HAp-com formulations produced the highest OCN levels. NBT assays further revealed composition- and cell phenotype-dependent modulation of superoxide anion generation in THP-1 monocytes and macrophages. Overall, composites incorporating HAp-syn showed the most balanced combination of controlled surface properties, rheological reinforcement, no sustained cytotoxic effects, and enhanced mineralisation, supporting their potential for subchondral bone regeneration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haraźna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: