Key result
Higher fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with a lower prevalence (overall 5.6%) and incidence (overall 4.0% over 2.7 years) of psychological distress.
Why the study?
Does fruit and vegetable consumption reduce psychological distress in middle-aged and older adults?
Observational (n=60,404)
Does fruit and vegetable consumption reduce psychological distress in middle-aged and older adults?
Higher fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a lower prevalence of psychological distress in middle-aged and older adults, though longitudinal effects require further investigation.
Higher fruit/vegetable intake was associated with lower distress prevalence; leaves open whether increasing consumption reduces incidence.
OBJECTIVES: Growing evidence suggests a link between diet and mental health. This study aimed to investigate the association between fruit and vegetable consumption and the prevalence and incidence of psychological distress in middle-aged and older Australians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and prospective. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: A sample of 60 404 adults aged ≥45 years completed baseline (2006-2008) and follow-up (2010) questionnaires. Psychological distress was assessed at baseline and follow-up using the validated Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), a 10-item questionnaire measuring general anxiety and depression. Psychological distress was defined as the presence of high-to-very high levels of distress (K10 score ≥22). Usual fruit and vegetable consumption was assessed using short validated questions. The association between baseline fruit and vegetable consumption and the prevalence or incidence of psychological distress was examined using logistic regression models. RESULTS: At baseline, 5.6% reported psychological distress. After a mean 2.7 years of follow-up, 4.0% of those who did not report distress at baseline reported distress at follow-up. Baseline fruit and vegetable consumption considered separately or combined, was associated with a lower prevalence of psychological distress even after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle risk factors. Baseline fruit and vegetable consumption, measured separately or combined, was associated with a lower incidence of psychological distress in minimally adjusted models. Most of these associations remained significant at medium levels of intake but were no longer significant at the highest intake levels in fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption may help reduce psychological distress in middle-aged and older adults. However, the association of fruit and vegetable consumption with the incidence of psychological distress requires further investigation, including the possibility of a threshold effect between medium and higher consumption levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Psychological distress (n=60,404). Fruit and vegetable consumption was evaluated on Prevalence and incidence of psychological distress (K10 score ≥22). Higher fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with a lower prevalence (overall 5.6%) and incidence (overall 4.0% over 2.7 years) of psychological distress.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: