Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two POM-based lanthanide derivatives, namely {triaqua[2,6-diacetylpyridine bis(semicarbazone)-κ5 O,N,N′,N′′,O′]terbium(III)}-μ-oxido-[tricosa-μ2-oxido-dodecaoxido-μ12-phosphato-dodecamolybdenum(VI)] pentahydrate (1), [Tb(C11H15N7O2)(H2O)3][PMo12O40]·5H2O, and the dysprosium(III) analogue (2), have been isolated successfully by the reaction of Keggin–POM [PMo12O40]3− (abbreviated as PMo12 ), the Ln3+ ion and the Schiff base 2,6-diacetylpyridine bis(semicarbazone) (DAPSC) ligand under hydrothermal conditions. [Ln(DAPSC)(H2O)3][PMo12O40]·5H2O is a PMo12 -supported cluster featuring a lanthanide–Schiff base complex [denoted Ln– L (Schiff base)]. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that the LnIII ion is in a distorted tricapped trigonal prismatic arrangement, coordinated by six O atoms and three N atoms. Two O atoms and three N atoms are provided by one DAPSC ligand, while the additional O atoms originate from a PMo12 cluster and three water molecules. Hydrogen-bonding interactions between adjacent clusters form an interesting three-dimensional supramolecular structure. The identities of 1 and 2 were characterized by IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and powder X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, both compounds possess excellent two-photon absorption (TPA) responses to the third-order nonlinear optics (NLO) (2264 GM for 1 and 941 GM for 2), suggesting that they have potential applications in the field of nonlinear optics (NLO). To our knowledge, 1 and 2 are the first POM-based Ln– L (Schiff base) complexes showing excellent two-photon responses. Meanwhile, the electrochemical properties of both compounds were studied in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: