Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compare two previously introduced theoretical definitions of the Z⁰ mass and show that one of them, frequently used, is gauge dependent in O(α³) in a wide class of gauges and in O(α²) in the complementary class. We then discuss a slightly modified version that circumvents these problems, is endowed with desirable theoretical properties, and can be identified with the mass measured at the CERN e⁺{e}^{{{-}}}$ collider LEP. The simple formulation that emerges is applied to illustrate properties of the physical amplitude, related to gauge invariance, and the role played by the two definitions of mass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Sirlin (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: