Key result
High-flow nasal cannula is being investigated compared to low-flow nasal cannula for preventing hypoxia during ERCP in a planned randomized controlled trial of 132 high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Does high flow nasal cannula prevent hypoxia compared to low flow nasal cannula in high-risk patients undergoing ERCP?
RCT (n=132)
Open-label
1:1 computer generated, stratified in blocks
Yes
Does high flow nasal cannula prevent hypoxia compared to low flow nasal cannula in high-risk patients undergoing ERCP?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to determine if high-flow nasal cannula reduces hypoxia compared to standard low-flow oxygen during ERCP in high-risk patients.
Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an increasingly common intervention in the treatment of pancreatico-biliary disorders. Patients are often elderly with complex co-morbidities. While monitored anaesthesia care with sedation is commonly used for most cases, few would require general anaesthesia with an endotracheal tube. Both low flow and high flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) are established ways of delivering supplemental oxygen, but it is unclear whether one technique is better than the other. HFNC seems a promising tool for advanced procedures but evidence to support its application in high-risk ERCP cases is limited. The rate of oxygen desaturation during endoscopy has been reported to be as high as 11-50%, and the method of oxygen delivery for ERCP merits further study. Methods/design This is a prospective, randomised, multi-centre trial comparing the efficacy of oxygen supplementation through high flow nasal cannula versus low flow nasal cannula during ERCP, in a cohort of patients at risk of adverse respiratory events. A total of 132 patients will be recruited across three sites and randomly assigned to either the low flow or the HFNC group. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients experiencing hypoxia, defined by any event of SpO2 <90%. The secondary outcomes include parameters centred on oxygenation, requirement of airway manoeuvres, successful completion of procedure, perioperative complications, patient satisfaction, and cost analysis of the consumables. An intention-to-treat principle will be applied while analysing. Discussion The demand for ERCPs is likely to increase in the future with the aging population. Our study results may lead to improved outcomes and reduce airway related complications in patients undergoing ERCPs. The results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in per-reviewed journals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiruvenkatarajan et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in High risk patients undergoing Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n=132). High flow nasal cannula vs. Low flow nasal cannula (4 L/min) was evaluated on Proportion of patients experiencing hypoxia (SpO2 < 90% of any duration). High-flow nasal cannula is being investigated compared to low-flow nasal cannula for preventing hypoxia during ERCP in a planned randomized controlled trial of 132 high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: