CONTEXT: Vitamin D deficiency is often treated or prevented by high intermittent doses of vitamin D to achieve a better treatment adherence, but treatment outcomes were contradictory, and even a transient increase in fracture and fall risk was reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the short-term effects on bone turnover markers of a single bolus of vitamin D₃. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTION: Twelve elderly subjects (eight women, four men; mean age 76 ± 3 yr) were given a single oral bolus of 600,000 IU vitamin D₃. Blood samples were taken at baseline and 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 d after vitamin D₃ administration. Twenty-four subjects served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, PTH, C-terminal-telopeptides of type I collagen, cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (sNTX), osteocalcin, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. RESULTS: No relevant changes in 25OHD and bone turnover markers were observed in the controls. In treated subjects, serum 25OHD attained a peak increment to 67.1 ± 17.1 ng/ml (P < 0.001) at d 3. Subsequently it slowly decreased to 35.2 ± 5.8 ng/ml (P <0.01 vs. a baseline value of 21.7 ± 5.6 ng/ml). Mean serum PTH concentration decreased by 25-50% and serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D rose by 25-50%. Serum CTX and sNTX rose significantly at d 1 (P < 0.01), they attained a peak increment greater than 50% at d 3, and they subsequently decreased almost back to baseline values at d 90. Serum osteocalcin slightly rose within the first 3 d and then declined by d 60. No changes were observed in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the use of large doses of vitamin D may be associated with acute increases in C-terminal-telopeptides of type I collagen and sNTX, which may explain the negative clinical results obtained by using intermittent high doses of vitamin D to treat or prevent vitamin D deficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossini et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: