Key result
Systematic cardiometabolic health checks achieve high stakeholder acceptance but reveal key implementation barriers.
Why the study?
A stepwise screening approach for detection and management of cardiometabolic disease is proposed in primary care guidelines, but implementation experiences are unclear.
Implementing systematic cardiometabolic screening in primary care requires careful preparation of staff, integration with clinical practice, and predefined follow-up programs to be successful.
Despite acceptance, implementation barriers warrant caution before scaling cardiometabolic checks; leaves open optimal staff training and follow-up protocols.
BACKGROUND: A stepwise screening approach for the detection and management of cardiometabolic disease is proposed in various primary care guidelines. The aim of this study was to explore the implementation of a cardiometabolic health check as perceived by the involved caregivers and patients. METHODS: Qualitative process evaluation of the implementation of a cardiometabolic screening programme in a multidisciplinary primary healthcare centre in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, in which 1270 patients had participated. We explored the caregivers' experiences though focus group discussions and collected patients' experiences through a written questionnaire containing two open-ended questions. We analyzed our data using a thematic content analysis based on grounded theory principles. RESULTS: Five general practitioners, three practice nurses and five medical receptionists participated in the focus groups. Additionally we collected experiences of 657 (52% of 1270) participating patients through an open-ended questionnaire.GPs were enthusiastic about offering a health check and preferred systematic screening over case-finding, both in terms of yield and workload. The level of patient participation was high and most participants were enthusiastic about the health check being offered by their GP. Despite their enthusiasm, the GPs realized that they lacked experience in the design and implementation of a structured, large-scale prevention programme. This resulted in suboptimal instruction of the involved practice nurses and medical receptionists. The recruitment strategy was unnecessarily aggressive. There were shortcomings in communicating the outcomes of the health check to the patients and there was no predefined follow-up programme. Based on our findings we developed a checklist that can be used by designers of similar health checks. CONCLUSIONS: A number of fundamental issues may arise when GPs organize a systematic screening programme in their practice. These issues are related to the preparation of the involved staff, the importance of integration with everyday clinical practice, the approach of healthy patients and the provision of adequate follow-up programmes. The identified challenges and recommendations can be taken into account during future screening programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godefrooij et al. (2014) studied Cardiometabolic disease prevention (n=1,270). Cardiometabolic health check was evaluated on Stakeholder experiences and perceptions of the implementation process. A systematic cardiometabolic health check was well-received by patients and general practitioners, but its implementation highlighted challenges in staff preparation, patient communication, and follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: