Key result
SFMetrics is a semi-automatic analysis tool capable of measuring geometrical properties such as length, volume, and angles from DNA and protein complexes in scanning force microscopy images.
SFMetrics provides a versatile, semi-automatic metrology toolbox for high-throughput analysis of scanning force microscopy images of biomolecules.
May streamline biomolecular metrology workflows; leaves open prospective validation before research adoption.
BACKGROUND: Scanning force microscopy (SFM) allows direct, rapid and high-resolution visualization of single molecular complexes; irregular shapes and differences in sizes are immediately revealed by the scanning tip in three-dimensional images. However, high-throughput analysis of SFM data is limited by the lack of versatile software tools accessible to SFM users. Most existing SFM software tools are aimed at broad general use: from material-surface analysis to visualization of biomolecules. RESULTS: We present SFMetrics as a metrology toolbox for SFM, specifically aimed at biomolecules like DNA and proteins, which features (a) semi-automatic high-throughput analysis of individual molecules; (b) ease of use working within MATLAB environment or as a stand-alone application; (c) compatibility with MultiMode (Bruker), NanoWizard (JPK instruments), Asylum (Asylum research), ASCII, and TIFF files, that can be adjusted with minor modifications to other formats. CONCLUSION: Assembled in a single user interface, SFMetrics serves as a semi-automatic analysis tool capable of measuring several geometrical properties (length, volume and angles) from DNA and protein complexes, but is also applicable to other samples with irregular shapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez et al. (2015) studied this question. SFMetrics software was evaluated. SFMetrics is a semi-automatic analysis tool capable of measuring geometrical properties such as length, volume, and angles from DNA and protein complexes in scanning force microscopy images.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: