Key result
Anticoagulation adherence is primarily hindered by cost, bleeding fears, and cognitive deficits, but aided by caregiver support.
Why the study?
Adherence to anticoagulation in individuals with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation is suboptimal due to various barriers and enablers that are not fully understood from patient and provider perspectives.
What are the barriers and enablers to adherence to anticoagulation in individuals with chronic heart failure and concomitant atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=144)
No
What are the barriers and enablers to adherence to anticoagulation in individuals with chronic heart failure and concomitant atrial fibrillation?
Multiple patient, provider, and systemic barriers hinder anticoagulation adherence in HF and AF, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and nursing advocacy to optimize stroke prevention.
Barriers may guide tailored support in HF-AF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before changing practice.
AIMS & OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the barriers and enablers to adherence to anticoagulation in individuals with chronic heart failure (CHF) with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) from the perspective of patients and providers. BACKGROUND: CHF and AF commonly coexist and are associated with increased stroke risk and mortality. Oral anticoagulation significantly reduces stroke risk and improves outcomes. Yet, in approximately 30% of cases, anticoagulation is not commenced for a variety of reasons. DESIGN: Qualitative study using narrative inquiry. METHODS: Data from face-to-face individual interviews with patients and information retrieved from healthcare file note review documented the clinician perspective. This study is a synthesis of the two data sources, obtained during patient clinical assessments as part of the Atrial Fibrillation And Stroke Thromboprophylaxis in hEart failuRe (AFASTER) Study. RESULTS: Patient choice and preference were important factors in anticoagulation decisions, including treatment burden, unfavourable or intolerable side effects and patient refusal. Financial barriers included cost of travel, medication cost and reimbursement. Psychological factors included psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment and depression. Social barriers included homelessness and the absence of a caregiver or lack of caregiver assistance. Clinician reticence included fear of falls, frailty, age, fear of bleeding and the challenges of multimorbidity. Facilitators to successful prescription and adherence were caregiver support, reminders and routine, self-testing and the use of technology. CONCLUSIONS: Many barriers remain to high-risk individuals being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention. There are a number of enabling factors that facilitate prescription and optimise treatment adherence. Nurses should challenge these treatment barriers and seek enabling factors to optimise therapy. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses can help patients and caregivers to understand complex anticoagulant risk-benefit information, and act as a patient advocate when making complex stroke prevention decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferguson et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure with concomitant atrial fibrillation (n=144). Anticoagulation was evaluated on Barriers and enablers to adherence to anticoagulation. Key barriers to anticoagulation included patient preference, financial burden, cognitive impairment, and clinician fears of bleeding and falls, while caregiver support and routine acted as enablers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: