Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a haematopoietic stem cell disorder, that is characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts and suppression of normal haematopoiesis. The 3 + 7 regimen is the backbone of standard first-line induction therapy among young/fit patients. However, in elderly and/or unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, who cannot receive intensive chemotherapy, low-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine) are the treatment options, which generally cannot induce durable responses. Among young/fit patients, for high-risk disease in first remission, or in cases with relapsed/refractory AML, allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be performed when complete remission is achieved. However, since AML is primarily a disease of the elderly, neither intensive chemotherapy nor allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be generally tolerated in most cases. There is clearly a need for new treatment options in elderly and young/unfit patients who cannot receive intensive chemotherapy. The discovery of novel molecular genetic markers (e.g. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2) resulted in the development of new therapeutic options in AML. This review mainly focuses on 4 targeted therapy agents; glasdegib and venetoclax used in combination treatment with low-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents among newly diagnosed cases with AML; and ivosidenib and gilteritinib as monotherapy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML, which were all approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Küçükyurt et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: