Key result
Diabetes linked to ~40% higher risk of late cardiac events after SVG stenting.
Why the study?
The impact of diabetes mellitus on early and late clinical outcomes after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts was not known.
Does diabetes mellitus worsen early and late clinical outcomes in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting?
Cohort (n=908)
Does diabetes mellitus worsen early and late clinical outcomes in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting?
Diabetes mellitus is associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality, increased target lesion revascularization, and lower cardiac event-free survival following saphenous vein graft stenting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetes associated with higher in-hospital mortality and lower 1-year event-free survival after SVG stenting; extends native-vessel observations but leaves optimal management strategies open.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare early and late clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus have less favorable acute and long-term outcomes after stent implantation in native coronary arteries. The impact of diabetes on SVG stenting, however, is not known. METHODS: We studied 908 consecutive patients (1,366 SVG lesions) treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. In-hospital and late clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates at one year) were compared between diabetic (n = 290) and nondiabetic (n = 618) patients. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in diabetic as compared with nondiabetic patients (2.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.003). At one-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 16.6% in diabetic and 12.3% in nondiabetic patients (p = 0.03). Overall cardiac event-free survival (freedom from death, Q-wave myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization procedure) at one year was significantly lower in the diabetic (68%) compared with the nondiabetic patients (79%, p = 0.0003). By Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of both TLR (relative risk: 1.23; confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.58; p = 0.004) and late cardiac events (relative risk: 1.40; confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.86; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes undergoing stent implantation in SVG have: 1) higher in-hospital and late mortality, 2) higher one-year TLR rates, and 3) significantly lower one-year cardiac event-free survival. Thus, diabetic patients have less favorable acute and late clinical outcomes after stent implantation in SVG lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Saphenous vein graft lesions requiring stenting (n=908). Diabetes mellitus vs. Nondiabetic was evaluated on Late cardiac events (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05-1.86, p=0.02). Diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting was associated with a higher risk of late cardiac events (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.05-1.86; p=0.02) and lower event-free survival.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: