Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An analysis of a continuous-time bandpass sigma–delta modulator in a configuration with an upconverter is given for a RF class D amplifier application. The upconverter multiplies the modulator pulse train with a synchronised clock signal and maps each modulator bit to an integer multiple k of a (+1, −1) or (−1, +1) pattern depending on the sign of the modulator bit. The upconversion is equivalent to an extension of Manchester encoding, which is usually defined for k=1. The analysis focuses on evaluating the impact of upconversion on the modulator coding efficiency and the average pulse period. A design equation is derived, which shows that coding efficiency is dependent only on the upconversion frequency ratio, while the average pulse period depends only on k. The equations provide a designer with a way of evaluating the trade-offs in the amplifier system and show that encoding with k=1 is the most efficient configuration for maximising coding efficiency and minimising switching power loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: