Key result
Catheter ablation for AF in situs inversus dextrocardia achieves ~40% sinus rhythm maintenance after repeat procedures.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia is challenging due to contrary anatomy and associated anomalies, with limited cases and literature available.
Does catheter ablation using an improved imaging strategy safely and effectively treat atrial fibrillation in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia?
Observational (n=10)
No
Does catheter ablation using an improved imaging strategy safely and effectively treat atrial fibrillation in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia?
Catheter ablation for AF in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia is feasible and safe with advanced imaging integration, but long-term rhythm control remains poor.
Supports ablation feasibility and safety in rare dextrocardia anatomy; leaves open strategies to improve modest long-term rhythm control.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF-CA) in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia (SID) can be challenging because of the contrary anatomy and associated anomalies. Cases and literature regarding AF-CA in SID are rare and provide little information. Our study aims to present an improved procedure, ablation strategies, and evaluate the safety and outcomes of AF-CA in patients with AF and SID. METHODS: A total of 10 patients with AF-SID (mean age, 60.4 ± 15.7 years; six paroxysmal AF, four persistent atrial fibrillation [PeAF]) were enrolled. For the improved procedure, images obtained by preacquired computed tomography and three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping, integrating intracardiac echocardiography, and x-ray imaging data are necessary to optimize the transseptal puncture and ablation procedure. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent 13 AF-CA procedures without complications, including three patients received repeat procedures. However, two PeAF patients presented sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after the AF-CA procedure, and one underwent permanent pacemaker implantation therapy during hospitalization. During the follow-up period (6-72 months), the outcomes were not favorable: three patients (30%) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) after the initial procedure; after repeated procedures, the overall SR rate was 40% (four patients). CONCLUSION: With the improved strategy, AF-CA can be safely and effectively performed with low radiation exposure in patients with SID. However, the long-term outcomes were not favorable, even when managed at a tertiary center by a team of specialists. Moreover, patients with PeAF might also have masked SSS, which should be carefully considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia (n=10). Catheter ablation was evaluated on Overall sinus rhythm maintenance after repeated procedures. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia yielded an overall sinus rhythm maintenance rate of 40% after repeated procedures.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: