Key result
Mitral regurgitation jet direction fails to reliably predict unilateral pulmonary vein flow patterns.
Why the study?
Pulmonary vein flow patterns have been used to assess mitral regurgitation severity, but the influence of regurgitant jet direction on right and left pulmonary vein flow patterns is unclear.
Does regurgitant jet direction selectively influence the pattern of flow in right and left pulmonary veins in patients with severe mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=37)
Does regurgitant jet direction selectively influence the pattern of flow in right and left pulmonary veins in patients with severe mitral regurgitation?
Mitral regurgitation jet direction does not predictably or selectively cause unilateral alterations in pulmonary vein flow patterns assessed by transesophageal echocardiography.
Jet direction should not guide pulmonary vein flow interpretation in mitral regurgitation; challenges echocardiographic assumptions and leaves open need for validation studies.
Pulmonary vein flow patterns measured with transesophageal echocardiography have been used recently to assess the severity of mitral valve regurgitation. This study was designed to determine whether regurgitant jet direction selectively influences the pattern of flow in right and left pulmonary veins. Thirty-seven patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement for severe valvular regurgitation were studied intraoperatively with biplane transesophageal echocardiography. Regurgitant jets were classified by color flow mapping as central or wall, with the latter further classified as septal, lateral, anterior, or posterior in the two orthogonal scan planes. Pulmonary vein flow patterns were measured with pulsed wave Doppler ultrasonography and categorized as showing normal, blunted, or reversed systolic flow. Right and left pulmonary vein flow patterns were identical in the majority of patients studied (78%). Eight patients had discordant flow patterns. In seven of eight patients, the more abnormal pattern was seen in the right pulmonary vein, despite the fact that the regurgitant jets were directed centrally in four of these seven patients. Since discordant pulmonary vein flow patterns occurred in 5 of 15 patients (33%) with central jets, but in only 3 of 22 patients (14%) with eccentric wall jets, it is unlikely that mitral regurgitation jet direction per se causes predictable and selective unilateral alteration in pulmonary vein flow patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark et al. (1995) conducted an observational in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=37). Central regurgitant jets vs. Eccentric wall jets was evaluated on Discordant pulmonary vein flow patterns. Mitral regurgitation jet direction did not predictably alter unilateral pulmonary vein flow, with discordant patterns in 33% of central jets versus 14% of eccentric wall jets.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: