This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Studies of condom efficacy rely on self-reported behavior. Objective markers of exposure to semen may provide a more valid assessment of condom failure and failure to use condoms. GOALS OF THIS STUDY: To compare three semen biomarkers: acid phosphatase (AP) activity, prostate specific antigen (PSA), and the human seminal plasma antigen (MHS-5). STUDY DESIGN: Twenty women were intravaginally inoculated with six measured, increasingly larger amounts of their partners' semen. Vaginal fluid was collected by the participant using swabs and tested. RESULTS: Background levels of PSA were low (0.00-1.25 ng/ml), background levels of AP were variable (0-350 U/l), and all preinoculation samples were negative for MHS-5. All postinoculation samples were positive for PSA, 64 of 117 (55%) for AP, and 14 of 120 (12%) for MHS-5. CONCLUSION: The PSA immunoassay was the best semen biomarker under these sampling and testing conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LAWSON et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: