Key result
SUSPECT evaluates cardiac CT for detecting relevant CAD in asymptomatic military aircrew.
Why the study?
Bicycle exercise-testing lacks diagnostic accuracy for relevant CAD in low-risk populations like military aircrew, while cardiac CT may better detect subclinical CAD for early intervention.
Does cardiac CT improve detection of relevant coronary artery disease in asymptomatic military aircrew aged ≥40 years compared to exercise ECG?
Cross-Sectional (n=250)
No
Does cardiac CT improve detection of relevant coronary artery disease in asymptomatic military aircrew aged ≥40 years compared to exercise ECG?
This study design outlines a prospective cohort evaluating whether cardiac CT is superior to exercise ECG for detecting relevant coronary artery disease in asymptomatic military aircrew.
Planned cardiac CT evaluation in asymptomatic aircrew leaves open superiority over exercise ECG for relevant CAD detection.
Background: Sudden in-flight incapacitation of aircrew may cause an airplane crash. Important causes are major adverse cardiac events, such as myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac arrest. Aircrew of the Royal Netherlands Air Force (RNLAF) are required to undergo periodic cardiac screening, including bicycle exercise-testing. Unfortunately, this modality lacks diagnostic accuracy for relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) in low-risk populations similar to military aircrew. Cardiac CT, however, comprising Coronary Artery Calcium score (CACS) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA), is able to adequately detect (subclinical) CAD with high negative predictive values in low-risk populations and may provide opportunity for early interventions. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, cohort study of 250 military aircrew. Asymptomatic aircrew ≥40 years are asked to undergo a voluntary cardiac CT following routine aeromedical examination. Prevalence and severity of CAD will be described according to the CAD-RADS system, including coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and high risk plaque features. The primary endpoint is relevant CAD, defined as a composite of a coronary stenosis ≥50% and/or CACS >100 Agatston Units. The secondary endpoint is ‘aeromedically significant CAD’, defined by national military regulations as a left main stenosis of >30%, any luminal stenosis ≥50%, and/or an aggregate coronary stenosis of ≥120%. Conclusions: The aim is to assess the value of cardiac CT for routine aeromedical screening in asymptomatic Dutch military aircrew aged ≥40 years, in comparison to the current cardiac screening protocol which includes an exercise ECG. Trial Registration: Clinical trial registered on clinicaltrials.gov number NCT05508893.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frijters et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=250). Cardiac CT (CACS and CCTA) vs. Routine aeromedical screening (exercise ECG) was evaluated on Relevant CAD, defined as a composite of a coronary stenosis ≥50% and/or CACS >100 Agatston Units. The SUSPECT study is a planned prospective cross-sectional study designed to assess the value of cardiac CT for detecting relevant coronary artery disease in asymptomatic military aircrew.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: