Key result
Poor DAPT response linked to ~88% higher three-year MACE in young STEMI patients.
Why the study?
A subset of patients on antiplatelet therapy continue to have recurrent cardiovascular events possibly due to antiplatelet resistance, with unclear impact on prognosis in young STEMI patients.
Does poor response to dual antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in young patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Cohort (n=123)
Does poor response to dual antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in young patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Poor responsiveness to dual antiplatelet therapy is highly prevalent (48%) in young STEMI patients and is associated with a significantly increased risk of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events.
May support risk stratification in young STEMI; leaves open whether testing should guide therapy.
BACKGROUND: A subset of patients who take antiplatelet therapy continues to have recurrent cardiovascular events which may be due to antiplatelet resistance. The effect of low response to aspirin or clopidogrel on prognosis was examined in different patient populations. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of poor response to dual antiplatelet therapy and its relationship with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in young patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In our study, we included 123 patients under the age of 45 with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous intervention. A screening procedure to determine both aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness was performed on the fifth day of admission. We followed a 2x2 factorial design and patients were allocated to one of four groups, according to the presence of aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance. Patients were followed for a three-year period. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We identified 48% of resistance against one or more antiplatelet in young patients with STEMI. More MACE was observed in patients with poor response to dual platelet therapy or to clopidogrel compared those with adequate response to the dual therapy (OR: 1.875, 1.144-3.073, p < 0.001; OR: 1.198, 0.957-1.499, p = 0.036, respectively). After adjustment for potential confounders, we found that poor responders to dual therapy had 3.3 times increased odds for three-year MACE than those with adequate response to the dual therapy. CONCLUSION: Attention should be paid to dual antiplatelet therapy in terms of increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events especially in young patients with STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somuncu et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=123). Poor response to dual antiplatelet therapy vs. Adequate response to dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 1.875, 95% CI 1.144-3.073, p=<0.001). Poor response to dual antiplatelet therapy in young STEMI patients significantly increased the odds of three-year MACE compared to adequate response (OR 1.875; 95% CI 1.144-3.073; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: