Different MR Angiography Techniques Provide Different Results in Assessing Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

Radiology reports should use concluding section headings such as 'Interpretation' or 'Opinion' rather than 'Impression' to convey professional certainty instead of vague beliefs to referring clinicians. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.METHODOLOGICAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

Franz A. Fellner

doi:10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770468b

August 1, 2001American Journal of RoentgenologyOpen Access

Different MR Angiography Techniques Provide Different Results in Assessing Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Design

Editorial

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

The author argues against using the term 'Impression' in radiology reports, suggesting 'Interpretation' or 'Opinion' to convey more certainty.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Franz A. Fellner (2001) reported a letter.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab8cf2463c97c5cfd7e2b6e https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770468b

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Different MR Angiography Techniques Provide Different Results in Assessing Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Different MR Angiography Techniques Provide Different Results in Assessing Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading