Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
After the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident, many efforts were put into the determination of the presence of 137 Cs, 134 Cs, 131 I, and other gamma-emitting radionuclides in the ocean, but minor work was done regarding the monitoring of less volatile radionuclides, pure beta-ray emitters or simply radionuclides with very long half-lives. In this study we document the temporal evolution of 129 I, 236 U, and Pu isotopes ( 239 Pu and 240 Pu) in seawater sampled during four different cruises performed 2, 3, and 4 years after the accident, and we compare the results to 137 Cs collected at the same stations and depths. Our results show that concentrations of 129 I are systematically above the nuclear weapon test levels at stations located close to the FDNPP, with a maximum value of 790 × 10 7 at·kg –1, that exceeds all previously reported 129 I concentrations in the Pacific Ocean. Yet, the total amount of 129 I released after the accident in the time 2011–2015 was calculated from the 129 I/ 137 Cs ratio of the ongoing 137 Cs releases and estimated to be about 100 g (which adds to the 1 kg released during the accident in 2011). No clear evidence of Fukushima-derived 236 U and Pu isotopes has been found in this study, although further monitoring is encouraged to elucidate the origin of the highest 240 Pu/ 239 Pu atom ratio of 0.293 ± 0.028 we found close to FDNPP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casacuberta et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: