Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects, if any, of 3 different breath-holding techniques on a person's ability to attain vocal fold closure (VFC) to successfully complete swallowing maneuvers. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Private practice. PATIENTS: A total of 150 healthy volunteers recruited from private practice patients and community volunteers. Intervention Group 1 received the easy breath-hold instruction; group 2 received the inhale/easy breath-hold instruction; and group 3 received the hard breath-hold instruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Closure of true and false vocal folds following the breath-hold instruction. RESULTS: In the easy breath-hold group, true VFC occurred in 82% of the subjects, and closure of both the true and false vocal folds occurred in 30%. In the inhale/easy breath-hold group, true VFC occurred in 62%, and closure of both folds occurred in 46%. In the hard breath-hold group, true VFC occurred in 86%, and closure of both folds occurred in 64%. The differences among the 3 groups were significant for true VFC (chi2=9.242; P=.01) and for closure of both folds (chi2=11.625; P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: The hard breath-hold instruction was the most effective method to attain full laryngeal closure, and the inhale/easy breath-hold instruction was the least effective method to attain true VFC for safe swallowing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donzelli et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: