Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Prolonged urine leakage (PUL) from the percutaneous tract after percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a major complication that necessitates the placement of a urethral Double-J stent. We analyzed the characteristics of patients who had this complication to find out its risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 6-year period, 1407 standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were performed at our institution. Medical charts were reviewed focusing on the patients who required Double-J placement because of PUL from the percutaneous tract for more than 24 hours after removal of the nephrostomy tube. A total of 81 patients in whom a Double-J stent was placed because of ureteropelvic injury or pelvicaliceal extravasation or as a part of percutaneous endopyelotomy were excluded from the study. Factors that are considered to have an impact on this untoward event were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Double-J stent was placed in a total of 57 (4.3%) patients who were found to have PUL. Stone size was significantly larger in the stented group (10.0 +/- 5.6 cm(2) vs. 7.8 +/- 5.3 cm(2)). The stones were classified as complex in 68.4% of patients in the stented group and in 53.4% of patients in the nonstented group, and this difference was also statistically significant. Stone-free rate was significantly higher in the nonstented group (p < 0.05). Residual stone and additional treatment rates were statistically higher in the stented group (p < 0.05). Access number and location as well as per-operative bleeding were not predictive factors for PUL development. CONCLUSION: The necessity for Double-J placement due to PUL from the percutaneous tract, diminishes with increase in stone-free rates. Stone size and stone complexity are other predictive factors for PUL development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Binbay et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: