Perepletchikova and Kazdin discuss the issue of establishing treatment integrity in the context of treatment outcome research. They offer important insights into the potential explanations for the conflicting results and suggest directions for future assessment and research designs. This commentary, in the context of Perepletchikova and Kazdin's paper, discusses (a) issues related to the definition and assessment of treatment integrity and its components and (b) the scientific, practical, and clinical applications of assessing treatment integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobson et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: