Key result
A standardized image analysis method using FIJI for quantifying lipid content in mouse thermogenic adipose tissue was highly reproducible, demonstrating ~99% inter-rater reliability.
A standardized FIJI-based image analysis method provides highly reproducible quantification of lipid content in mouse thermogenic perivascular adipose tissue.
Enables standardized lipid quantification in mouse thermogenic adipose tissue; leaves open validation for human studies.
Quantification of adipocyte size and number is routinely performed for white adipose tissues using existing image analysis software. However, thermogenic adipose tissue has multilocular adipocytes, making it difficult to distinguish adipocyte cell borders and to analyze lipid proportion using existing methods. We developed a simple, standardized method to quantify lipid content of mouse thermogenic adipose tissue. This method, using FIJI analysis of hematoxylin/eosin stained sections, was highly objective and highly reproducible, with ∼99% inter-rater reliability. The method was compared to direct lipid staining of adipose tissue, with comparable results. We used our method to analyze perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) from C57BL/6 mice on a normal chow diet, compared to calorie restriction or a high fat diet, where lipid storage phenotypes are known. Results indicate that lipid content can be estimated within mouse PVAT in a quantitative and reproducible manner, and shows correlation with previously studied molecular and physiological measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tero et al. (2021) studied Thermogenic adipose tissue lipid quantification. Standardized image analysis in FIJI vs. Direct lipid staining was evaluated on Inter-rater reliability of lipid content quantification. A standardized image analysis method using FIJI for quantifying lipid content in mouse thermogenic adipose tissue was highly reproducible, demonstrating ~99% inter-rater reliability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: