Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in lung tissue samples for the estimation of clinical impact was carried out. Methods and Materials: A high pressure liquid chromatography system (HPLC) with ultraviolet-visible diode array detector (DAD) and fluorescence (FLD) detection was used. An automated solvent extraction (ASE) procedure with sample clean-up was employed for the extraction of PAHs from the lung tissue samples. The chromatographic method allowed identification of a total number of 16 PAHs: naphtalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene, and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene using fluorescence detection, whereas acenaphtylene was identified using a diode array detector (DAD). Results: The linearity domain for the method was between 5 pg/µL and 400 pg/µL for each compound. The quantification limits were between 0.5 pg/µL and 20 pg/µL. Automated solvent extraction was used for obtaining recoveries between 82–120%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cioroiu et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: