Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several titanium(IV) complexes of the type Cp′Ti(NMe2)3 [Cp′ = cyclopentadienyl (1), (dimethylaminoethyl)cyclopentadienyl (2), indenyl (3), and pentamethylcyclopentadienyl (4)] were prepared, and their catalytic properties in the polymerization of α-olefins were examined. Complexes 1 and 2 catalyzed the polymerization of ethylene in the presence of methylaluminoxane with a much higher activity than 3 or 4. Complexes 3 and 4 polymerized ethylene with an activity similar to that of CpTiCl3 (6). The preactivation of 2, 3, or 4 with trimethylaluminum (TMA) resulted in an increase in ethylene polymerization activities. Also, 1 and 2 were successfully used as ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization catalysts, producing polymers with various amounts of 1-hexene incorporation, depending on the amount of 1-hexene in the feed mixture. Complex 1 likewise effectively polymerized styrene with a higher activity and higher syndiospecificity than the other three catalysts. Complexes 3 and 4 polymerized styrene with low syndiospecificity, whereas 2 produced only atactic polystyrene. The preactivation of 3 or 4 with TMA resulted in an increase in styrene polymerization activities and increased the syndiotacticity percentage of the polymers produced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhodes et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: