Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
English A deep philosophical divide exists between ‘strictly objective’ scientists, who believe that engaging in civic debates undermines objectivity, and ‘citizen scientists’, who believe scientists can – and at times should – help decision makers incorporate sound scientific knowledge. Here we suggest that the threat posed to scientific objectivity by the escalating politicisation of science provides a limited bridge between these competing philosophical views: a commitment to scientific objectivity requires a greater civic presence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higgins et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: