Key result
CMR enables comprehensive structural, functional, and tissue characterization in acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
Why the study?
Cardiac magnetic resonance has become a crucial imaging technique for evaluating acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies, but an updated review of its role and recent advances is needed.
This review highlights the crucial role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the comprehensive evaluation, diagnosis, and risk stratification of acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
May support CMR use for evaluation and risk stratification in acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
Cardiomyopathies refer to a variety of myocardial disorders without underlying coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, hypertension, or congenital heart disease. Several imaging modalities are available, but cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has now established itself as a crucial imaging technique in the evaluation of several cardiomyopathies. It not only provides comprehensive information on structure and function, but also can perform tissue characterization, which helps in establishing the etiology of cardiomyopathy. CMR is also useful in establishing the diagnosis, providing guidance for endomyocardial biopsy, accurate quantification of function, volumes, and fibrosis, prognostic determination, risk stratification, and monitoring response to therapy. In this article, we review the current role of CMR in the evaluation of several acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies, particularly focusing on recent advances in knowledge. We also discuss in detail a select group of common acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajiah et al. (2016) conducted a review in Acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance is a crucial imaging technique for evaluating acquired nonischemic cardiomyopathies, providing comprehensive structural, functional, and tissue characterization data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: