Abdelmalek Sayad’s sociology of migration can be interpreted as an eminent form of reflexive political sociology and has more than one connection with Bourdieu’s conception of the state as state thought and the sociological-political approach outlined by the French sociologist. Firstly, by placing migrants as the unthought limit of the state, Sayad questions and challenges the classifications of state thought that present it as a homogeneous reality almost ontologically linked to the nation. On the other hand, it will be shown how the restructuring of national political fields around the national/non-national opposition, already noted by Bourdieu in the 1990s, reintroduces the theme of reformulation, in contrast to the current trend, of a radical-democratic approach. Finally, the latter should be able to deconstruct the non-essential link between state and nation from a juridical point of view (as Hans Kelsen pointed out) and thus render the discriminatory prerogatives imprinted in traditional national sovereignty unfounded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea Girometti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: