OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the load-bearing capacity and reliability of different zirconia materials used for inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs), considering the influence of substrate type (tooth substrate or resin composite) and thermo-mechanical aging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRFDPs (N = 160) were fabricated using four zirconia materials: IPS e.max ZirCAD LT (3Y-TZP), Katana YML (3Y-5Y graded zirconia), Katana HTML Plus, and Katana STML (n = 40 each). Restorations were adhesively cemented onto tooth or resin composite substrates and tested either under dry conditions or after thermo-mechanical aging (1,200,000 cycles, 50 N, 5-55 °C). Fracture load was determined using monotonic load-to-fracture testing. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Reliability of durability was assessed using Weibull analysis. RESULTS: Under dry conditions, material (p = 0.0047), substrate (p = 0.0237), and their interaction (p = 0.0004) significantly influenced fracture load. YML-composite (1406 ± 386 N) and HTML-composite (1142 ± 249 N) showed higher values than STML-composite (553 ± 246 N). No significant differences were observed on tooth. substrate After aging, material and interaction effects remained significant (p < 0.05). HTML-tooth showed the highest fracture load (1727 ± 351 N), while STML-composite showed the lowest (718 ± 292 N). Weibull analysis indicated comparable reliability after aging. CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia type and substrate significantly influenced mechanical performance of IRFDPs. High-translucent and graded zirconia showed substrate-dependent behavior, whereas 3Y zirconia was more stable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Zirconia selection and bonding substrate influence fracture resistance of IRFDPs. High-translucent zirconia requires careful substrate selection, while 3Y zirconia provides more consistent performance in posterior applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helbling et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: