Drawing on the intellectual legacy of Shannon Bell, I argue that pornography has been politically retooled as a capacious moral category through which non-normative gender and sexuality are rendered threats to social order. Focusing on ‘Project 2025’ as a central case study, I demonstrate how anti-porn discourse functions as an infrastructural mechanism for governing trans life in the digital age. Situating recent policies within a longer genealogy of obscenity regulation, the article traces how appeals to child protection mobilize affective economies of fear to justify expanded censorship, surveillance, and platform liability. I show how these dynamics operate across legal frameworks, platform moderation, and public discourse, producing a regulatory formation in which anti-trans, anti-porn, and anti-sex work logics converge. In doing so, this article contributes to porn studies and trans studies by offering a framework for understanding how sexual stigma structures the conditions of digital visibility, precarity, and survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jake E. Knight (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: