This study examines Imam al-Tirmidh?’s critical expression “ghar?b min h?dh? al-wajh” (“ghar?b through this particular route”) as employed in J?mi? al-Tirmidh?. The expression is important because it reflects the nuanced relationship between singularity in transmission, isn?d criticism, and the overall evaluation of a hadith. The study aims to clarify the expression's semantic scope, identify what al-Tirmidh? intends by restricting ghar?bah to a particular wajh (route), and demonstrate its implications through applied analysis of selected narrations. The research employs an inductive approach to identify relevant occurrences in J?mi? al-Tirmidh? and an analytical approach to examine the transmission routes, narrator assessments, corroborating reports, and the judgments of hadith critics. Two representative cases are examined. The first is a narration that al-Tirmidh? describes as “ghar?b min h?dh? al-wajh” while its transmitters are assessed between thiqah and ?ad?q; its singularity therefore does not necessarily undermine its acceptability. The second is a narration concerning the virtue of S?rat al-Dukh?n whose chain contains ?Umar b. Ab? Khath?am and Sufy?n b. Wak??, both criticised by hadith scholars; in this case, ghar?bah is accompanied by substantial weakness in the isn?d. The study concludes that “ghar?b min h?dh? al-wajh” should not be treated as an automatic declaration of weakness. Rather, it normally identifies singularity in a particular transmission route, while the final evaluation depends on the reliability of narrators and the existence and quality of other routes. The finding demonstrates the precision of al-Tirmidh?’s critical vocabulary and highlights the need to read his terminology contextually rather than in isolation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wahab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: