This paper presents a distributed multi-agent control (DMAC) framework for an electric-vehicle (EV)-integrated renewable microgrid with photovoltaic generation, a wind turbine, a battery energy storage system, 100 EV agents, and a grid-forming inverter. Power-balance estimation uses a two-tier average-consensus scheme: the EV fleet first reaches consensus on its own aggregate charging demand over a 100-node communication graph, and the five physical agents then reach consensus on the system power balance over a separate 5-node graph. The battery setpoint is set by a two-agent incremental-cost dispatch between the battery and the grid (or the battery and curtailment, depending on the direction of the power imbalance). The inverter’s frequency and voltage dynamics are integrated at 1-second resolution beneath a 60-second supervisory loop, and voltage is computed over three radial feeder laterals rather than a single bus. Every disturbance event (islanding, communication outage, line outage, battery fault, cyberattack/false-data injection) is physically wired into the simulation and evaluated separately. Results are reported as the mean and 95% confidence interval over 10 independent 24-hour simulations for five cases: the full DMAC framework, a centralised first-come-first-served baseline, a centralised baseline using the same EV policy as DMAC, and two DMAC ablations. Consensus converges on 97.9% of steps; dispatch converges on 99.95% of steps; voltage standard deviation is 0.0187± 0.0002 p.u.; and holding the EV policy fixed, distributed and centralised coordination are statistically indistinguishable, indicating that the observed performance differences between DMAC and a conventional baseline come from the EV charging policy and dispatch method rather than the coordination architecture itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jigneshkumar P. Desai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: