This study examines how technostress is associated with employees’ information security compliance behavior among employees of a South Korean bank, an organization that has adopted AI-enabled information systems, and investigates the moderating role of perceived organizational support (POS). Drawing on Conservation of Resources theory and Organizational Support Theory, technostress is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct comprising techno-overload, techno-invasion, techno-complexity, techno-insecurity, and techno-uncertainty. Using survey data from 257 employees, hierarchical regression analysis shows that all five technostress dimensions are negatively associated with security compliance behavior. POS significantly moderates only the techno-overload–compliance relationship (corrected β = .044, p < .05); the four remaining interaction terms are not significant, and a nested-model test indicates that the moderating block as a whole does not reach conventional significance, ΔF(6, 242) = 2.03, p = .06. These results indicate that general technology-induced stress—measured with an established, general-purpose technostress scale rather than an AI-specific instrument—is associated with lower security compliance, and that organizational support offers only a partial, targeted buffer. This study contributes to the information systems literature by testing technostress as an antecedent of security compliance behavior in a high-security, AI-enabled organizational setting, while explicitly delineating the boundary between general technostress and AI-specific stress mechanisms (e.g. algorithmic opacity), which the present measures do not distinguish and which future research should operationalize directly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youngkeun Choi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: